![]() The midterm primaries began on March 1st, in Texas, and will continue through the fall, allowing voters in each state to narrow the field in races for the House, Senate, and governors’ mansions. Trump-as well as a profound test of American democracy. Remington said Gableman intended to use his appearance in court to distract from his office’s failure to comply with past court orders to supply records requested by American Oversight.The 2022 midterm elections will be a referendum on the current President, Joe Biden, and his predecessor, Donald J. Vos put his work on hold this spring pending the outcome of lawsuits challenging his ability to subpoena elected officials and others who worked on elections. Gableman has issued two interim reports, but his work has faced a barrage of bipartisan criticism. Biden’s victory has survived two recounts, multiple lawsuits, a nonpartisan audit and a review by a conservative law firm. The investigation has cost taxpayers about $900,000 so far. Gableman was hired a year ago by Vos, under pressure from Donald Trump to investigate the former president’s loss to President Joe Biden by just under 21,000 votes in Wisconsin. “I have been made aware of threats, for example, that I had ‘better watch my back,’ or ‘I hope the judge has a gun.’ One online suggestion has been for a group to protest at my home as has been reported at the home of United States Supreme Court Justice Kavanagh.” “Unfortunately, the Court has observed firsthand the effect of Gableman’s unfounded accusation that I am biased and that I am an advocate for American Oversight,” Remington wrote. Remington, in his order, said he would ignore the comment, but he referenced the killing earlier this month of a retired Wisconsin judge. Gableman, during his testimony, said he would not be “railroaded” and accused the judge of advocating against him. ![]() American Oversight attorney Dan Schwager praised the ruling in a statement, saying he hoped it would compel Gableman to comply with the order and release all of the requested records. Westerberg did not immediately return a message seeking comment. Westerberg coming back to chambers is a sad reminder that in 2022, woman lawyers still have to do more than be excellent at their job,” the judge said. Remington said Gableman’s behavior was misogynistic and an “affront to the judicial process and an insult” to Westerberg. “Why – why don’t you come back into my chambers so you can dictate.” Westerberg?” Gableman said at the hearing as quoted in the ruling, impersonating the judge. ![]() “Why don’t you come right up to the bench, Ms. His order cites comments Gableman made that were captured by the microphone while the court was in recess where he made sarcastic comments about the judge and the ability of American Oversight’s attorney Christa Westerberg to do her job without the help of the judge. Gableman could face additional sanctions that include suspension or revocation of his license to practice law. Remington forwarded the order to the office that hands down disciplinary actions against attorneys and judges in Wisconsin. Remington chided Gableman for what he called his “unprofessional conduct” and for launching into “an irrelevant diatribe” at last week’s hearing. Gableman’s attorneys did not immediately return messages seeking comment on the judge’s order. 6 panel subpoenas counsel who resisted Trump schemes
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |